Ed's Blog

Investor rights on chopping block in U.S. Senate (updated)

By Ed Mierzwinski
Consumer Program Director

Update: (Thursday): The Senate is about to vote on two PIRG-backed amendments, by Sens. Jeff Merkley (OR) on adding oversight to crowd-funding and Jack Reed (RI) on public reporting reforms. We support these pro-investor amendments, but as our new U.S. PIRG letter to the Senate states, we still oppose the underlying, so-called JOBS Act, even if the amendments are added:

"Even with these changes, however, other provisions of the bill would unleash a new wave of damaging fraud in the private offering market, make it easier to commit accounting fraud, reignite the abusive securities analyst practices that fueled the tech stock boom and bust, undermine comparability of financial reporting, enable the Regulation A small offering exemption to be gamed by mid-sized companies seeking to evade public reporting requirements, and create a myriad additional problems.  As a result, even with these changes, this bill does not deserve your vote.  We urge you to vote NO on H.R. 3606’s dangerous invitation to fraud and abuse in our capital markets."

Update (Tuesday):The PIRG-backed Reed-Landrieu-Levin amendment failed on a largely party line vote (60 votes required) -- but, consideration of the underlying bill has been delayed until Wednesday. Only 41 NO votes are needed to defeat the JOBS Act cloture motion; if it fails to get 60 YEA votes, then improving amendments -- including pieces of Reed-Landrieu-Levin -- will be in order and each will then only need a simple majority of Senators voting, not a super-majority of 60. So, we still have a chance to improve the bill.

ORIGINAL: Today, the U.S. Senate will consider the House-passed "JOBS" Act, which weakens investor protections -- many passed after the Internet bubble burst and Enron's follow-on bankruptcy destroyed jobs and retirement savings. Its supporters claim the bill to make it easier for small companies to navigate SEC rules and  thereby promote small company growth (which theoretically creates, you guessed it, jobs), has already been thoroughly vetted. Yet, the bill is opposed by some of the Senate's most thoughtful investor champions and opposed by U.S. PIRG and numerous consumer and investor organizations. We support a substitute proposal to be offered by Senators Jack Reed (RI), Mary Landrieu (LA) and Carl Levin (MI). But if the substitute fails to get 60 votes, the Jobs Act will be non-amendable under an ill-advised special fast-track system set up to speed it through.

Here is U.S. PIRG's letter opposing the underlying JOBS Act and supporting the Reed-Landrieu-Levin substitute. Excerpt: "This legislation will leave seniors and family retirement savings at greater risk of fraud and speculative losses, and will strip accountability and transparency requirements that make markets work better for investors and businesses alike. We are writing to urge you to seize this last opportunity to address the flaws that create these problems."

The good news, so far, is that the first vote has been delayed until 4pm. Opposition to the bill continues to heat up. Last week, the New York Times columnist Gail Collins derided the bill's potential to create telephone boiler room stock sales swindle operations, often targeted at older Americans  and sometimes called bucket shops, when she called it the "Just Open Bucket Shops" Act. Today, the New York Times editorial board, in its editorial "You Scratch My Back..."  says: "JOBS, named in Orwellian fashion, is not about jobs. It is about undoing investor safeguards in federal law, including parts of the Sarbanes-Oxley law and other landmark protections, so that companies can raise money without having to follow rules on disclosure, accounting, auditing and other regulatory mainstays."  Professor and former S&L regulator William Black writes at the Huffington Post: "The JOBS Act Is So Criminogenic That It Guarantees Full-Time Jobs for Criminologists." The Portland (ME) Press-Herald reprises an editorial in the St. Louis Post Dispatch and says:  "The effect almost certainly will be more fraud than jobs."

While the proponents of the legislation claim that the President backs it, here is what the latest Statement of Administration Policy says: "The Administration looks forward to continuing to work with the House and the Senate to craft legislation that facilitates capital formation and job growth for small businesses and provides appropriate investor protections."

Our colleagues at the Americans for Financial Reform continue to compile other statements and reports in opposition to the bill.

Carl Levin is the Chairman of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations who held landmark hearings on Goldman Sachs and the role of investment banks in the financial crisis. Mary Landrieu is Chair of the Senate Special Committee on Aging. Jack Reed chairs the Senate Banking Securities Subcommittee with jurisdiction over investor protection. If these Senators are opposed to the bill because they say it harms investors, including older Americans, shouldn't that matter to the rest of the Senate? We will see.


In fact, not only tall,true religion jeans thin stature to put on cowboy true religion outletThe vagaries of the cowboy world, cheap true religionjeans fashion tips precisely in its cotton fiber material has a natural good ductility true religion for saleand its exquisite type pants cut with leg type perfect fit true religion for womenshape beautiful curves. Coach began in a family business by six leather ,cheap coach outlet New York is still the home of the Coach Coach, coach factory outletproduction of every product remains 100% hand assembly. coach outlet series of festive return to bring the two lovely shape, coach factory its color and texture perfectly fit the holiday theme. coach online store a little desultory fashion flavor with Coach iconic horse and carriage logo.

Check the http://www.larsri.org/help.aspx acknowledgment action for the item. Some sellers who are affairs affected accoutrements do not acquiesce any returns. Read over the seller's description for inconsistencies, such as advertence the account is bound copy but the agent has added than one. Scrutinize the photographs that accompany the listing. If the agent alone has one or two pictures, ask for more. Attending at the central characterization for http://www.iplsa.org/online.html any misspellings or unevenness. Accurate artist handbags do not accept mistakes and consistently use the aforementioned fonts. A lot of artist purses should aswell accept an central lining with a print. Observe the exoteric of the bag for flaws. Accurate accoutrements accept balanced prints, and the prints do not cut off on the edges. Absolute purses do not accept bed-making mistakes on the seams. Attending over any covering to see if looks fake. Look for Louis Vuitton items on the broad website. Louis Vuitton does not advertise wholesale. It alone advertise anon from http://www.lamppool.com/nice.asp its food and few baddest flush retailers. Check for money aback guarantees from the websites. Legitimate business accept some affectionate of acknowledgment policy, and absolute broad companies accept minimum acquirement requirements, clashing retail stores. Examine the transaction methods for the artist backpack website. If you cannot use a above acclaim agenda or Paypal, be apprehensive about the company's affirmation to http://www.ventnorcity.org/researches.asp be affairs absolute purses. If it alone uses non-traceable transaction methods, such as wire transfers or money orders, it is a lot of acceptable a scam. Look at the accouterments on the purse. All buckles, clasps, zippers and chains should be top superior and sturdy. If the accouterments can be calmly angled or tarnished, it is acceptable a fake. Examine the purse's material. Chanel purses are fabricated from the finest abstracts such as leather, suede and high-quality fabrics. If the http://www.celebrationofthesuds.com/node.asp in catechism feels cheap, chiffon or thin, it is acceptable a replica purse. Be acquainted that Chanel purses are never fabricated from lambskin but rather calfskin.

Yet, the bill is opposed by some of the Senate's most thoughtful investor champions and opposed by http://www.design.org.au/node.cfm U.S. PIRG and numerous consumer and investor organizations. We support a substitute proposal to be offered by http://www.italia-hotel.com/longchampoutlet.asp Senators Jack Reed (RI), Mary Landrieu (LA) and Carl Levin (MI). But if the substitute fails to get 60 votes, the http://www.planbois.it/style.aspx Jobs Act will be non-amendable under an ill-advised special fast-track http://www.cedricleborgne.com/results.html system set up to speed it through.

Priority Action

The overuse of antibiotics on factory farms is threatening the effectiveness of lifesaving antibiotics. Call on the Obama administration to put an end to the worst practices.

Support Us

Your donation supports U.S. PIRG’s work to stand up for consumers on the issues that matter, especially when powerful interests are blocking progress.

Consumer Alerts

Join our network and stay up to date on our campaigns, get important consumer updates and take action on critical issues.