Ed's Blog
New York Times is running a bank fees debate, seeks comments
Over at the New York Times, you can participate in a debate on bank fees by submitting comments. The paper asked six experts to tee up the issue with opening remarks. The experts include two of our colleagues in the coalition Americans for Financial Reform. Chi Chi Wu of the National Consumer Law Center argues that "Profits Are the Reason for Fees, Not Risk or Costs" and Sarah Ludwig of NEDAP says that "Public Obligations Outweigh Rights To Obscene Profits."
Other commentators include New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman and others. U.S. PIRG's latest bank fee tips are available. Here is another recent post on bank fees where I discuss various fee issues in detail. Note that as part of the overdraft fee inquiry I discuss in that post, the CFPB has extended its overdraft fee comment period until June 29. Let them know what you think.
"
.
Tools & Resources
-
A New Direction In Driving Trends
Our Changing Relationship with Driving and the Implications for America’s FutureU.S. PIRG Education Fund
Our Affiliates
Contact
Archives
You Can Help
We have a chance to cut billions in junk food subsidies this year. Your support will help us do the research, advocacy and grassroots organizing to convince our elected officials to act.
PRIORITY ACTION
Each year, our tax dollars pay for enough junk food additives to buy 8.5 two-liter bottles of soda for each person under 18. Help stop the subsidies for junk food.
Consumer Alerts
Join our network and stay up to date on our campaigns, get important consumer updates and take action on critical issues.