Ed's Blog

Senators Hold CFPB Director Hostage, Roil Markets

By Ed Mierzwinski
Consumer Program Director

On Friday, 43 Senate Republicans -- as they did in the last Congress -- again sent the President a letter saying they would not confirm Richard Cordray to a full term as Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) director unless the agency's powers and independence were first gutted. Their intransigence means more market uncertainty that further delays recovery from the Wall Street-induced worldwide economic collapse of 2008. It also ignores the views of a growing number of responsible financial industry leaders who know at least three things the Senators either don't know or don't care about.

First, the financial industry now knows that the CFPB's actions in Director Cordray's first year as a recess appointee have been fair and balanced. He and the bureau have been accessible, careful and transparent.

Second, the banks and other firms know that delaying his confirmation -- especially under the specter that a recent "radical" appellate decision concerning the National Labor Relations Board may eventually lead to voiding his recess appointment entirely -- adds uncertainty to the marketplace that hinders their ability to make loans and offer new products that can build the economy. Senate approval of Cordray makes that uncertainty go away.

Third, the banks know that they lose and predatory payday lenders and other non-banks win if the director's appointment is voided by the courts. Big banks are fully regulated by the CFPB regardless of whether it has a confirmed director. On the other hand, the bureau's full powers over non-banks -- including payday lenders, credit bureaus,  mortgage companies and others -- may only be exercised with a director in place. That situation would create an unlevel playing field that harms consumers, markets and good actors, since the CFPB was intended to protect you no matter where you purchase your financial products (at a bank or a non-bank). (Note that at least one leading CFPB expert at the National Consumer Law Center believes the CFPB has all its authority regardless of whether it has a director.)

But those 43 Senators opposed to consumer protection don't recognize any of these points. Instead, they are presuming that the court decision adds impetus to continue their reign of uncertainty. But as Public Campaign suggests, the $143 million in Wall Street campaign cash those opponents have received probably doesn't hurt, either.

In 2008, Congress used taxpayer dollars to bail out the big banks. While the bailout saved Wall Street, it didn't save the economy. In 2010, Congress finally enacted sweeping reforms intended to prevent another collapse with passage of the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (more in U.S. PIRG's Wall Street Reform Guide).

A centerpiece of that reform was establishment of the CFPB as the first federal financial regulator with only one job -- protecting consumers. Since 2010, House and Senate opponents of consumer protection (although the Senate letter brazenly claims to be from consumer protectors) have attempted to turn back the clock and re-litigate the creation of the CFPB.

As Mike Konczal of the Roosevelt Institute explains in his blog, and Professor Arthur Wilmarth details in a law review article, arguments that the CFPB is unaccountable are specious. First, the new agency was given the same independent funding as the other bank regulators (actually, CFPB is already less independent, since only the CFPB's funding has a hard cap ceiling, while the other regulators can raise additional funds without Congressional authority). Second, its single director structure is not unique; the most important of the other bank regulators, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), also has a single director. Further, only the CFPB's decisions are subject to a unique veto power by other regulators. And, only the CFPB is subject to additional small business regulatory requirements before it can take action.

Regardless, the Senate opponents again want to condition Cordray's confirmation on further limiting the CFPB's authority to protect the public. First, they want the CFPB to be the only bank regulator subject to the highly-politicized Congressional appropriations funding process. That makes Wall Street lobbyists more powerful. Second, they want to convert its single director to a 5-member commission. That's a debatable policy question, but it has already been asked and answered. Finally, they want to strengthen the existing one-of-a-kind authority of the other regulators to veto CFPB's decisions. Again, we've been there and done that.

Holding Director Cordray's nomination hostage to unreasonable policy demands can have only result: greater uncertainty that harms consumers, banks, the economy and the democratic process. In 2010, all these demands were considered and defeated. Yet, the minority of Senators persist in their unreasonable demands to tie the confirmation to policy changes, despite growing evidence that their views are those of an ever-diminishing minority.

It's worth noting that most of those advocating or “predicting” a deal to weaken the CFPB are not bank employees or even staff of industry trade associations. Instead, they’re self-interested lawyers and lobbyists (who prefer and profit from endless political and legal uncertainty) and their friends on Capitol Hill. This situation arises for only one reason – because a minority of Senators, nearly all of whom who voted against financial reform and against the CFPB’s creation, are now trying to hold the President’s well-qualified nominee hostage to their efforts to nullify the law and eviscerate a duly created, badly needed, effective consumer protection agency.

Any Senators who oppose a simple up-or-down vote on this nomination – or who try to bargain for weakening changes in the CFPB – are playing politics with the pocketbooks of the American people and the safety of our economy. There should not be any negotiating with those who hold that dangerous and untenable position.

By the way, several Senators who signed the letter linking Cordray's confirmation to their unreasonable political demands, including John McCain (AZ), Roy Blunt (MS), Susan Collins (ME) and Richard Burr (NC), have argued that they will oppose a filibuster on Chuck Hagel, the nominee for Secretary of Defense.  Blunt, who opposes Hagel, went so far as to say, according to the New York Times:

“For a cabinet office, I think 51 votes is generally considered the right standard for the Senate to set, and at that level, I think he makes it,” Senator Roy Blunt of Missouri, a member of the Republican leadership, said Friday on Fox News, even as he announced his opposition to Mr. Hagel."

Why propose to use the 60-yeas-required filibuster rule to fight one nomination and not the other? Why Cordray but not Hagel? Their inconsistency has no justification except to continue the reign of uncertainty they have placed over the CFPB's efforts to protect consumers and markets.

Kudos to President Obama and Senate Banking Chairman Tim Johnson, who've both pledged to fight for Cordray's confirmation without accepting the demands in the opponents' letter. The opponent-senators face a simple choice: they can change their views and allow an up/down vote on Richard Cordray’s nomination -– or they can continue to demand the unreasonable policy changes that were defeated in 2010. Their insistence on weakening the CFPB serves Wall Street, but not consumers who want protection no matter where they purchase their financial products. Their insistence on weakening the CFPB serves payday lenders, but not the banks that will be regulated no matter what.

Take a look at the CFPB's website and at what it has done for consumers and markets in the year-and-a-half since it started work in July 2011 and the year since it has had a director. It is taking complaints from financial customers, fining banks that break the law and returning ill-gotten gains to their customers, cleaning up the mortgage marketplace, providing mortgage and student loan customers with "know before you owe" tips, protecting servicemembers and their families from rip-offs and even regulating the previously-mysterious credit scoring marketplace. It's doing all this with a refreshing candor and transparency and outreach to the public and financial firms, while submitting to innumerable oversight hearings on Capitol Hill. The CFPB should be allowed to go forward, under current law and under the direction of Richard Cordray, who deserves immediate Senate approval for a full term.

Comments

Well, that is not surprising but instead of contemplating the situation and waiting for trouble How about some positive counter-action?
Unless I am very mistaken the US constitution also offers the power of Referendum to the people. This is no longer the time for polls or petitions, Let us help the CFPB by holding a public referendum on the subject, the result of which will be conclusive and binding.
If that was powerful enough to discharge General De Gaulle of his duties, it should be strong enough to consolidate the CFPB's appointment.
There is a lot of work to be done, this is no longer the time to indulge in endless bickering.
Then next, there should be another such vote of the people to ban a certain type of parasite of the lobbyist genus.
What has happened to "We the People", is it just a manta?

I know your expertise on this. I must say we should have an online discussion on this. Writing only comments will close the discussion straight away! And will restrict the benefits from this information.
http://fb.me/2I8E9Uu9h
http://fb.me/1z6FGBNTX
http://goo.gl/xqhLHF
http://fb.me/32LE7izdi
http://vo.to/ciptojunaedy
http://vo.to/mobilsedancorolla

It was great to see the old printshop and everyone who works there again. I am excited to see a printing business still operating and growing, great job guys
one way flights

People and negotiators are so careful nowadays especially if it is a public content and matter. There is no surprise is that; a published material is so tightly concerned with the mortgage business party. Because if there are flaws in the settlement, that means public will make them pay.
http://rosie.besaba.com/alfamart-official-partner-merchandise-piala-duni...
http://maskodoq.blogspot.com/2013/07/CiptoJunaedy.html
http://maskodoq.blogspot.com/2014/03/unit-link-terbaik-di-indonesia.html
http://etnisjawa.blogspot.com/2013/08/apakah-cipto-junaedy-bohong.html
http://rosie.besaba.com/situs-online-terbaik-terpercaya/

Wow! What an eye opener this post has been for me. Very much appreciated, bookmarked, I can’t wait for more!
https://www.rebelmouse.com/3secondsexualattractionreview/

But those 43 Senators opposed to consumer protection don't recognize any of these points. Instead, they are presuming that the court decision adds impetus to continue their reign of uncertainty. But as Public Campaign suggests, the $143 million in Wall Street campaign cash those opponents have received probably doesn't hurt, either.
http://etnisjawa.blogspot.com/2014/07/gudang-situs-online-terbaik-terper...
http://etnisjawa.blogspot.com/2014/07/agen-texas-dan-domino-online-indon...
http://rosie.besaba.com/pokrstar88/
http://rosie.besaba.com/cipto-junaedy-dan-karyanya/
http://dirosie.com/800/singgasana-hotels-resorts-pilihan-akomodasi-terba...
http://vacationsbythebeach.com/gudang
http://rosie.besaba.com/pokrstar88/
http://dirosie.com/800/singgasana-hotels-resorts-pilihan-akomodasi-terba...

Wow! This can be one particular of the most helpful webs. We have ever arrive across on this article. Actually Magnificent, I'm also an expert in this article therefore I can understand your effort.

Another excite news http://arentin.blogspot.com/2014/02/unit-link-terbaik-di-indonesia-commo... , & don't forget please browse vital article http://arentin.blogspot.com/2014/02/hotelmurahdijakarta.html & good article http://www.postingku.com Cipto & article http://arisnbw.blogspot.com/2013/10/ciptojunaedy.html & good article http://arisnb.nulis.web.id/cipto-junaedy.html Junaedy & vital article http://kerajinantembaga.aagallery.co.id dan http://arentin.blogspot.com/2013/05/cipto-junaedy.html and http://www.aagallery.co.id also http://www.aa-gallery.co.id and http://www.aagallery.net . Love it !

hadirlah agen casino sbobet terpercaya http://bandar365.com agen judi taruhan bola

Thanks for the post and great tips..even I also think that hard work is the most important aspect of getting success.
Top 10 gaming laptops

unlock her legs review: rebelmouse.com/unlockherlegsreviews/
This is so beautiful and creative. I just love the colors and whoever gets it in the mail will be smiling.

You are allowed to post names, but not links, unless they are approved and on topic.
hd desktop backgrounds

his is my first time i visit here. I found so many entertaining stuff in your blog, especially its discussion. From the tons of comments on your articles, I guess I am not the only one having all the leisure here! Keep up the excellent work.
sbobet 338a live casino

On earth of finance today, it is imperative to keep your credit score in a advanced for each your business and personal financial well-being. This can be a true hurdle, yet double notify credit monitoring can help. credit alerts Drones can be controlled manually on the ground or pre-programmed to run on their own to fly in the air like small airplanes. They�re currently used for bombing attacks in Pakistan by the U.S. military and for entertainment. growing drone These days the market is filled with all types of bad credit car loans as well as deals in which enable individuals with bad credit to get a car. Most individuals however believe that many of them are only slick marketing strategies attempt to benefit from unsuspecting those who have credit car

luar biasanya agen sbobet http://walibola.co
http://goo.gl/ye9xKV

This is cool post and i enjoy to read this post. your blog is fantastic and you have good staff in your blog. nice sharing keep it up.
ground ladder testing

creative sprint workouts
Thanks for the post and great tips..even I also think that hard work is the most important aspect of getting success.

Great post full of useful tips! My site is fairly new and I am also having a hard time getting my readers to leave comments. Analytics shows they are coming to the site but I have a feeling “nobody wants to be first”.
does the text your ex back system work

bail bonds san antonio
I really like the dear information you offer in your articles. I'm able to bookmark your site and show the kids check out up here generally. Im fairly positive theyre likely to be informed a great deal of new stuff here than anyone else!

cab orlando
I've just decided to create a blog, which I have been wanting to do for a while. Thanks for this post, it's really useful!

Pages

Priority Action

The overuse of antibiotics on factory farms is threatening the effectiveness of lifesaving antibiotics. Call on the Food and Drug Administration to put an end to the worst practices.

Support Us

Your donation supports U.S. PIRG’s work to stand up for consumers on the issues that matter, especially when powerful interests are blocking progress.

Consumer Alerts

Join our network and stay up to date on our campaigns, get important consumer updates and take action on critical issues.