You are hereHome >
Statement by Francisco Enriquez, U.S. Public Interest Research Group Tax and Budget Associate, on a potential $800 million settlement with the SEC and other federal agencies related to JPMorgan Chase’s $6 billion “London Whale” misconduct.
“In their effort to hold JPMorgan Chase accountable for its $6 billion “London Whale” fiasco, the SEC and other federal agencies must also protect taxpayers by ensuring that the financial giant does not receive a whale of a tax windfall for its irresponsibility. Unless regulators explicitly forbid JPMorgan Chase from writing off an $800 million settlement as a tax deduction, taxpayers could end up shouldering 35 percent of the cost of the settlement.
“Federal law forbids companies from deducting public fines and penalties from their taxes, but payments made as part of a settlement are treated differently. Companies that negotiate penalties through a legal settlement typically manage to deduct these penalties as a tax write-off unless their settlement agreement specifically forbids it. In essence, companies are allowed to receive a tax subsidy for their wrongdoing.
“The bank’s admission of wrongdoing for not responding more quickly to the problem would not in itself be enough to stop the bank from using the expense as a tax write off. Agencies must be explicit about prohibiting the write off, as the SEC did with Goldman Sachs in 2010 and the EPA and State Department typically do.
“When corporations treat their settlement fines as an ‘ordinary and necessary’ cost of doing business and take them as a tax write-off, ordinary Americans are left to pick up the tab. Every dollar that companies write off must be paid for through cuts to public programs, higher taxes or more government debt. That is unacceptable.
“Congress should close the settlement loophole to stop corporations like JPMorgan Chase from ripping off the American taxpayer.”
You can read U.S. PIRG’s report on the tax implications of legal settlements, “Subsidizing Bad Behavior: How Corporate Legal Settlements for Harming the Public Become Lucrative Tax Write-Offs.”
# # #
U.S. PIRG, the federation of state Public Interest Research Groups, is a consumer group that stands up to powerful interests whenever they threaten our health and safety, our financial security, or our right to fully participate in our democratic society.
Tools & Resources
Supporting "Consumer First" Fiduciary Standard
Trojan Horse Hidden In Data Breach Bill
To Senate Banking Committee
"Visa vs. Stoumbos" is before the Court's October term
DEFEND THE CFPB
Tell your representative to oppose the “Financial CHOICE Act,” which would gut Wall Street reforms and destroy the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau as we know it.
Your donation supports U.S. PIRG’s work to stand up for consumers on the issues that matter, especially when powerful interests are blocking progress.