logo Standing Up To Powerful Interests

Federal Preemption

 

What's New

On April 17, the Supreme Court ruled 5-3 that only the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) has the power to regulate subsidiaries of federally chartered banks, denying states the right to regulate the predatory mortgage-lending practices of national bank subsidiaries. The three dissenting Supreme Court justices said they found it “especially troubling that the court so blithely pre-empts” laws designed to protect consumers. This ruling comes at a time when missed home mortgage payments and foreclosures have risen to record levels in some parts of the country.  U.S. PIRG had joined an amicus prepared by the Center for Responsible Lending supporting the right of states to regulate predatory mortgage lenders.



Overview

Over the course of American history, state legislatures have often proved more nimble than Congress at addressing the needs of constituents. In fact, states will often serve as “laboratories of democracy.” Good ideas and sound policies will spread to other states and set a precedent for the federal government.

For instance, 10 states from Washington to Maine have passed more stringent emission standards for cars and SUVs. More than a dozen states have passed laws to allow consumers to defend themselves from identity theft by freezing their credit reports, and preventing thieves from opening new lines of credit. Voters in California passed a law that requires foods containing mercury and other toxic contaminants to be labeled.

Unfortunately, powerful corporate interests are pressing Congress and the Bush administration to wipe these and other effective state laws off the books and prevent states from charting their own course. U.S. PIRG is working to ensure that states can continue to solve local problems and do what it takes to protect the health and well-being of their residents—especially when the federal government has failed to do so.

Preemption Alert

Download the PDFs of our Preemption Alerts:

Issue 6, April 2007
Issue 5, December 2006
Issue 4, August 2006
Issue 3, April 2006
Issue 2, March 2006
Issue 1, February 2006

To subscribe to Preemption Alert, send an email to Research Director Alison Cassady.



Articles

OCC v. Spitzer: An Erroneous Application of Chevron That Should Be Reversed

Arthur Wilmarth Jr., BNA’s Banking Report, Vol. 86, No. 8, February 20, 2006. Posted with permission from the author. Download the article. (PDF)

A Stealth Attack On Strong Public Interest Protections

Powerful special interests are persuading Congress and the White House to impose federal law while wiping out the states' ability to pass stronger standards. A letter to members from former U.S. PIRG Executive Director Gene Karpinski, Winter 2004 Issue, U.S. PIRG Citizen Agenda Download the article. (PDF)

Preemption Of State Consumer Laws: Federal Interference Is A Market Failure

Written by Ed Mierzwinski, U.S. PIRG Consumer Program Director, for the Government, Law and Policy Journal, New York State Bar Association, Spring 2004 (Vol. 6, No. 1, pgs. 6-12). Download the article. (PDF)




Many states have passed food safety and labeling standards that are stricter than federal law. Big food manufacturers are fighting to eliminate these effective state protections. We're fighting to keep America healthy and informed about potentially harmful ingredients in the food they eat.

Fact Sheets

Download our "Federal Preemption of Stronger State Consumer and Public Health Protections: Examples of Upcoming Battles, March 2005." This is an analysis of likely preemption battles in the 109th Congress. (PDF)

 

SEARCH THIS SITE