Consumer Protection Updates

We Join Groups in FTC Privacy Complaints Against Facebook and Google's YouTube

By | Ed Mierzwinski
Senior Director, Federal Consumer Program

We've joined complaints that two behemoth firms are in violation of Federal Trade Commission privacy rules. In the first, U.S. PIRG joins the Electronic Privacy Information Center and other groups claiming that a number of Facebook's practices - particularly, its use of facial recognition techniques without consent -- violate a previous 2011 privacy order. The facial recognition practice may also violate PIRG-backed Illinois law. Second, we join the Center for Digital Democracy's filing alleging that Google's YouTube collects information about kids in violation of the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA). And we haven't forgotten about Equifax.

32 state Attorneys General to Congress: Don't replace our stronger privacy laws!

By | Mike Litt
Consumer Campaigns Director, U.S. PIRG

Some 32 Democratic and Republican state Attorneys General have sent a strong letter to the bi-partisan sponsors of a draft federal data breach and data security bill. The weak, industry-backed proposal from Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-MO) and Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) would override, or preempt, numerous better state privacy laws and, importantly, prevent states from ever again acting to protect their citizens' financial DNA better. We don't like the bill either.

Did Facebook Violate An FTC Privacy Order When It Did Business With Cambridge Analytica?

By | Ed Mierzwinski
Senior Director, Federal Consumer Program

Recent news stories about Facebook providing personal information to the data broker Cambridge Analytica raise a question: Is Facebook in violation of a 2011 Privacy Order with the Federal Trade Commission? We've joined leading consumer and privacy groups in a letter to the FTC raising issues for an investigation.

We Signed A Letter In 2014 But That Doesn't Mean We Support The Bank Lobbyist Act

By | Mike Litt
Consumer Campaigns Director, U.S. PIRG

Why would we support an amendment to make a bad bill worse? We wouldn't. Here's our explainer on how our signature on a 2014 letter should not have been used to somehow imply we supported an amendment to S2155 on credit scoring favoring Equifax and the other Big 3 credit bureaus.

News Release | U.S. PIRG | Financial Reform

Our Statement on Senate Passage of Sweeping Bank Deregulation Bill, S2155

Our statement on final passage by the U.S. Senate of a sweeping bank deregulation bill: Excerpt: "“It’s very hard to watch the Senate vote to ignore the painful lessons from the causes of the Great Recession 10 years ago. The warning signs are plain to see."

PIRG Consumer Watchdog: Asbestos Found In Children's Products

By | Dev Gowda
Director, Campaign for Toxic-Free Products

The PIRG Consumer Watchdog team recently found that three different products sold by national retail brand Claire’s contain alarming amounts of asbestos. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) considers it “unacceptable” for cosmetic talc to be contaminated with asbestos, and doctors say that there is no safe limit of asbestos.

News Release | U.S. PIRG | Financial Reform

Bank Deregulation Bill's Free Credit Freeze Section Tweaked, But Still Preempts Better State Laws

Here's our statement on modest changes to the free credit freeze provision of S2155, the massive bank regulation deregulation package on the Senate floor. The changes aren't good enough because the states would still be preempted from better protecting their consumers and some existing state laws would be rolled back.

Six Months Out From Equifax Hack, Are Consumers Any Better Protected?

By | Mike Litt
Consumer Campaigns Director, U.S. PIRG

Consumers agree: Equifax must be held accountable for its wrongdoing. Yet the Trump administration and Congress still haven’t taken action to do that, or to better protect consumers from identity theft in the future. What are they waiting for?

What You Haven’t Heard About that Bad Banking Bill; It Preempts State Identity Theft Reforms

By | Mike Litt
Consumer Campaigns Director, U.S. PIRG

We're opposing S2155 on the Senate floor this week. The main message against in the media has been that it puts mortgage borrowers at risk of bad loans and racial discrimination. Worse, it puts our economy at risk by removing important bank regulator tools to rein in risky practices by giant and big banks. For that matter, it could even allow risky practices to migrate to community banks. But there's more. The bill's so-called consumer protection provisions intended to offset its rollbacks, including its free credit freeze, aren't that good and preempt stronger state actions.

Pages

Support Us

Your donation supports U.S. PIRG’s work to stand up for consumers on the issues that matter, especially when powerful interests are blocking progress.

Consumer Alerts

Join our network and stay up to date on our campaigns, get important consumer updates and take action on critical issues.
Optional Member Code